Subject: Re: Reply from Woz Message-ID: <38679D0B.35EC5E8C@swbell.net> From: Rubywand Reply-To: rubywand@swbell.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 References: <38647B75.234F5F90@swbell.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 34 Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 11:08:27 -0600 NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.62.142.88 X-Complaints-To: abuse@swbell.net X-Trace: nnrp1.rcsntx.swbell.net 946314522 216.62.142.88 (Mon, 27 Dec 1999 11:08:42 CST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 11:08:42 CST Organization: SBC Internet Services Flag4 writes ... > .... > The "hacker" spirit which was responsible for the success of the original > Apple 1 and ] [, has long been shunned by Corporate Apple, almost from the > beginning. > Pretty much-- at least, once the company was established, it sluffed-off significant improvements to its II series and started looking for ways to sell business machines and become a 'respectable Real Computer maker'. Apple badly underestimated the importance of the home user market in terms of revenues, industry dominance, and as the driving force for technological innovation. > Maybe us "vintage freaks" can only dream of an Apple II-k, (my idea > for the name of the new machine !), but it is nice to know that Woz agrees > with us. Hopefully with a perpetuation of discussions like this . . may > lead to a ground-swell of support . . which may lead to . . who knows? Hard to say. There are a number of paths to knocking out current hardware barriers-- one is a 'Super IIgs' (or "II-k") expansion board with new Slots which could be housed in (and powered by) a PC mid-tower case at low cost. It would probably start out fairly 'bare bones'-- mainly lots of RAM, a faster processor, and a way to get better video. Rubywand